https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280741 Article 136 does not create a right of appeal, but a private party may seek special leave against an acquittal where a serious miscarriage of justice is alleged, so maintainability is not confined to the State. The Court also held that a conviction resting on credible eyewitness testimony cannot be overturned on speculative doubts about the FIR, ocular evidence, or medical evidence, especially where the trial court's reasons are supported by the record. The High Court's reversal was therefore unsustainable, and the trial court's conviction and sentence were restored under the Indian Penal Code. en-us Thu, 25 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Jul 2024 11:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280741 Article 136 does not create a right of appeal, but a private party may seek special leave against an acquittal where a serious miscarriage of justice is alleged, so maintainability is not confined to the State. The Court also held that a conviction resting on credible eyewitness testimony cannot be overturned on speculative doubts about the FIR, ocular evidence, or medical evidence, especially where the trial court's reasons are supported by the record. The High Court's reversal was therefore unsustainable, and the trial court's conviction and sentence were restored under the Indian Penal Code. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 25 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280741