<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1118 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380390</link>
    <description>The appeals by the assessee for the assessment years 2009-10 and 2010-11 were allowed, while the appeals by the Revenue for the same years were dismissed. For the assessment year 2011-12, the appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, with directions for reconsideration by the CIT(A). The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing appeals due to the genuine medical reasons of the authorized representative and directed proper adjudication based on the merits of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2019 07:03:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=571843" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1118 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380390</link>
      <description>The appeals by the assessee for the assessment years 2009-10 and 2010-11 were allowed, while the appeals by the Revenue for the same years were dismissed. For the assessment year 2011-12, the appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, with directions for reconsideration by the CIT(A). The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing appeals due to the genuine medical reasons of the authorized representative and directed proper adjudication based on the merits of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380390</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>