<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1113 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380385</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by deleting the addition under section 68, as it held that section 68 applies to sums found credited in the books of the assessee, not to cash deposits in a savings account. The Tribunal set aside the addition and allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal partially, ruling in favor of the appellant based on the interpretation of the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2019 07:02:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=571836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1113 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380385</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by deleting the addition under section 68, as it held that section 68 applies to sums found credited in the books of the assessee, not to cash deposits in a savings account. The Tribunal set aside the addition and allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal partially, ruling in favor of the appellant based on the interpretation of the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380385</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>