<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Commission to Son Allowed u/s 37; Full Payment Justified as Services Provided at Market Rate.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46629</link>
    <description>Disallowance u/s 37 - commission to the assessee’s son - when the rate of commission paid to other agents was on par with the rate paid to the assessee’s son and it is not the case of the Revenue that the son has not rendered any service then CIT(Appeals) is not justified in restricting the payment to 50% - allowed the claim in toto</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2019 07:02:51 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2019 18:53:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=571835" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Commission to Son Allowed u/s 37; Full Payment Justified as Services Provided at Market Rate.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46629</link>
      <description>Disallowance u/s 37 - commission to the assessee’s son - when the rate of commission paid to other agents was on par with the rate paid to the assessee’s son and it is not the case of the Revenue that the son has not rendered any service then CIT(Appeals) is not justified in restricting the payment to 50% - allowed the claim in toto</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2019 07:02:51 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46629</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>