<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Upholds Penalty u/s 271B for Late Tax Audit, Rejecting Medical Excuse for One Director&#039;s Inaction.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46624</link>
    <description>Penalty u/s 271B - TAR u/s 44AB upto 30th Sep., 2012 - The criminal proceedings were mounted in January, 2012 and the bail was granted in May, 2012 therefore even if the medical reasons of one of the director is accepted, it cannot be accepted that the other director was free enough to run business but was not capable to get the accounts audited - penalty upheld</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2019 07:02:47 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2019 07:02:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=571832" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Upholds Penalty u/s 271B for Late Tax Audit, Rejecting Medical Excuse for One Director&#039;s Inaction.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46624</link>
      <description>Penalty u/s 271B - TAR u/s 44AB upto 30th Sep., 2012 - The criminal proceedings were mounted in January, 2012 and the bail was granted in May, 2012 therefore even if the medical reasons of one of the director is accepted, it cannot be accepted that the other director was free enough to run business but was not capable to get the accounts audited - penalty upheld</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2019 07:02:47 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46624</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>