<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1110 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380382</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty under Section 271B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as the assessee failed to provide a reasonable cause for the delay in auditing the accounts. Despite citing criminal proceedings and director&#039;s illness as reasons for the delay, the Tribunal found them insufficient. The business continued to operate, and compliance could have been ensured. The penalty was affirmed, and the appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2019 11:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=571831" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1110 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380382</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty under Section 271B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as the assessee failed to provide a reasonable cause for the delay in auditing the accounts. Despite citing criminal proceedings and director&#039;s illness as reasons for the delay, the Tribunal found them insufficient. The business continued to operate, and compliance could have been ensured. The penalty was affirmed, and the appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380382</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>