<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Confirms Jurisdiction for Winding Up Relief in Oppression and Mismanagement Cases; Matter Sent Back for Review.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46642</link>
    <description>Winding Up - Oppression and mismanagement - Jurisdiction of Company Judge VS NCLT - A composite company petition is perfectly maintainable and this Court had the jurisdiction to grant the relief of winding up at the time of its preferment - impugned judgment to the extent it holds that this Court lacks jurisdiction is unsustainable - remitted to the Company Judge</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2019 07:02:25 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2019 17:49:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=571826" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Confirms Jurisdiction for Winding Up Relief in Oppression and Mismanagement Cases; Matter Sent Back for Review.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46642</link>
      <description>Winding Up - Oppression and mismanagement - Jurisdiction of Company Judge VS NCLT - A composite company petition is perfectly maintainable and this Court had the jurisdiction to grant the relief of winding up at the time of its preferment - impugned judgment to the extent it holds that this Court lacks jurisdiction is unsustainable - remitted to the Company Judge</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2019 07:02:25 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46642</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>