<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (5) TMI 58 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18182</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled that the question of whether interest under section 215 of the Income-tax Act should be charged based on the assessed income, excluding the enhanced share of the assessee from a firm, was a legal issue requiring adjudication. Despite arguments against its reference, the court emphasized the need for consideration based on legal principles and precedents. Consequently, the court directed the Tribunal to refer the question for further examination, highlighting the importance of addressing such legal queries within the judicial process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:27:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57182" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (5) TMI 58 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18182</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled that the question of whether interest under section 215 of the Income-tax Act should be charged based on the assessed income, excluding the enhanced share of the assessee from a firm, was a legal issue requiring adjudication. Despite arguments against its reference, the court emphasized the need for consideration based on legal principles and precedents. Consequently, the court directed the Tribunal to refer the question for further examination, highlighting the importance of addressing such legal queries within the judicial process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18182</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>