<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1099 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380371</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a refund claim dispute regarding service tax paid for construction services. It held that the service recipient, a Public Sector Undertaking engaged in defense production, was not a commercial concern. The construction of a compound wall was deemed non-commercial, leading to the approval of the refund claim. The Tribunal set aside the previous decision and granted the appellant the eligible refund, emphasizing the organization&#039;s essential role in defense production.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2019 11:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=571815" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1099 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380371</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a refund claim dispute regarding service tax paid for construction services. It held that the service recipient, a Public Sector Undertaking engaged in defense production, was not a commercial concern. The construction of a compound wall was deemed non-commercial, leading to the approval of the refund claim. The Tribunal set aside the previous decision and granted the appellant the eligible refund, emphasizing the organization&#039;s essential role in defense production.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380371</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>