<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1085 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380357</link>
    <description>Property tax could validly be imposed on the occupation and use of land for laying underground telecommunication cables, even where the cable operator was not the landowner. The court treated the levy as falling within the municipal corporation&#039;s existing property tax power rather than as a separate tax on cables, and held that the Indian Telegraph Act did not exclude such municipal taxation. The objection based on non-compliance with procedure for new taxes also failed because the demand was issued under the property tax provisions already in force, and no illegality in the assessment process was shown. The demand notices were therefore upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2019 07:01:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=571790" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1085 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380357</link>
      <description>Property tax could validly be imposed on the occupation and use of land for laying underground telecommunication cables, even where the cable operator was not the landowner. The court treated the levy as falling within the municipal corporation&#039;s existing property tax power rather than as a separate tax on cables, and held that the Indian Telegraph Act did not exclude such municipal taxation. The objection based on non-compliance with procedure for new taxes also failed because the demand was issued under the property tax provisions already in force, and no illegality in the assessment process was shown. The demand notices were therefore upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380357</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>