<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1084 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380356</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, deleting the disallowance under section 40A(2)(b) for excessive interest payment and reducing the disallowance under section 36(1)(iii) for interest expenses on advances. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of comparing fair market rates before disallowing payments under section 40A(2)(b) and adjusted the disallowance under section 36(1)(iii) to a proportionate amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2019 07:00:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=571789" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1084 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380356</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, deleting the disallowance under section 40A(2)(b) for excessive interest payment and reducing the disallowance under section 36(1)(iii) for interest expenses on advances. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of comparing fair market rates before disallowing payments under section 40A(2)(b) and adjusted the disallowance under section 36(1)(iii) to a proportionate amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380356</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>