<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1775 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280728</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee in cross-appeals against the denial of deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act and the provision made for overdue interest. The Tribunal held that the assessee&#039;s claims did not amount to concealment of income or filing inaccurate particulars, following the precedent set by the Supreme Court. It emphasized that making a claim, even if legally unsustainable, does not constitute furnishing inaccurate particulars. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, highlighting the need to differentiate between legal claims and deliberate concealment or inaccuracies in income reporting.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2019 12:07:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=571764" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1775 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280728</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee in cross-appeals against the denial of deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act and the provision made for overdue interest. The Tribunal held that the assessee&#039;s claims did not amount to concealment of income or filing inaccurate particulars, following the precedent set by the Supreme Court. It emphasized that making a claim, even if legally unsustainable, does not constitute furnishing inaccurate particulars. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, highlighting the need to differentiate between legal claims and deliberate concealment or inaccuracies in income reporting.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280728</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>