<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1618 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280739</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the deletion of an addition made by the Assessing Officer for disallowance of expenditure as capital expenditure and on gifts during the festive season was dismissed. The Tribunal upheld the Ld. CIT (A)&#039;s decisions, stating the AO&#039;s actions were not justified based on ICAI guidance notes for real estate transactions. The disallowances were deemed incorrect, leading to the dismissal of both appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2019 12:07:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=571758" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1618 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280739</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the deletion of an addition made by the Assessing Officer for disallowance of expenditure as capital expenditure and on gifts during the festive season was dismissed. The Tribunal upheld the Ld. CIT (A)&#039;s decisions, stating the AO&#039;s actions were not justified based on ICAI guidance notes for real estate transactions. The disallowances were deemed incorrect, leading to the dismissal of both appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280739</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>