<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (2) TMI 52 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18171</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Income-tax Officer&#039;s decision to disallow the deduction claimed by the assessee for expenses related to illegal liquor sales, including bribes paid to officials. Relying on established precedents and emphasizing that expenses for unlawful activities are not legitimate business expenditures, the court ruled in favor of the Revenue, denying the deduction of Rs. 52,589.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:02:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57171" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (2) TMI 52 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18171</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Income-tax Officer&#039;s decision to disallow the deduction claimed by the assessee for expenses related to illegal liquor sales, including bribes paid to officials. Relying on established precedents and emphasizing that expenses for unlawful activities are not legitimate business expenditures, the court ruled in favor of the Revenue, denying the deduction of Rs. 52,589.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18171</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>