<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 815 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280715</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the penalty under section 271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act was not justified as the appellant had cooperated with the assessment proceedings following completion under section 143(3), and previous decisions supported this stance. The appellant&#039;s challenge against the penalty of A.10,000/- for non-compliance with notices under sections 143(2) &amp;amp; 142(1) was successful.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2019 10:42:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=571686" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 815 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280715</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the penalty under section 271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act was not justified as the appellant had cooperated with the assessment proceedings following completion under section 143(3), and previous decisions supported this stance. The appellant&#039;s challenge against the penalty of A.10,000/- for non-compliance with notices under sections 143(2) &amp;amp; 142(1) was successful.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280715</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>