<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (6) TMI 59 - GAUHATI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18168</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee in a case involving the determination of capital gains, classification of legal expenses, and the opportunity of being heard before charging interest under the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court held that the date of acquisition of land should be based on the court decree, legal expenses for the sale deed were deemed capital expenditure, and no prior hearing was necessary before charging interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:56:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57168" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (6) TMI 59 - GAUHATI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18168</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee in a case involving the determination of capital gains, classification of legal expenses, and the opportunity of being heard before charging interest under the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court held that the date of acquisition of land should be based on the court decree, legal expenses for the sale deed were deemed capital expenditure, and no prior hearing was necessary before charging interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18168</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>