<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>AO Misclassifies Marketing Expenses as WIP, Ignoring ICAI Guidance; CIT(A) &amp; ITAT Correctly Apply, No Substantial Law Issue.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46608</link>
    <description>Allowable business expenditure u/s 37 - AO was in error in taking all the selling and market expenses to WIP ignoring the guidance note of ICAI as regards accounts of real estate transactions - both by the CIT (A) as well as the ITAT has been correctly applied guidance note of the ICAI - No substantial question of law arises</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2019 06:51:30 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2019 06:51:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=571668" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>AO Misclassifies Marketing Expenses as WIP, Ignoring ICAI Guidance; CIT(A) &amp; ITAT Correctly Apply, No Substantial Law Issue.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46608</link>
      <description>Allowable business expenditure u/s 37 - AO was in error in taking all the selling and market expenses to WIP ignoring the guidance note of ICAI as regards accounts of real estate transactions - both by the CIT (A) as well as the ITAT has been correctly applied guidance note of the ICAI - No substantial question of law arises</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2019 06:51:30 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46608</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>