<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1047 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL DIVISION BENCH, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380319</link>
    <description>Existence of financial debt and default was established from loan documents, mortgage and guarantee arrangements, acknowledgement of liability, assignment of the debt to the petitioner, NPA classification, and repeated non-payment. A conditional restructuring proposal, expressly revocable on continuing default, was cancelled after persistent non-compliance, so the original liability revived. Pending SARFAESI proceedings did not bar the independent remedy under the insolvency code. On these materials, the debt and default were proved, and the petition was admitted with commencement of CIRP against the corporate debtor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2019 06:50:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=571640" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1047 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL DIVISION BENCH, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380319</link>
      <description>Existence of financial debt and default was established from loan documents, mortgage and guarantee arrangements, acknowledgement of liability, assignment of the debt to the petitioner, NPA classification, and repeated non-payment. A conditional restructuring proposal, expressly revocable on continuing default, was cancelled after persistent non-compliance, so the original liability revived. Pending SARFAESI proceedings did not bar the independent remedy under the insolvency code. On these materials, the debt and default were proved, and the petition was admitted with commencement of CIRP against the corporate debtor.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380319</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>