https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380299 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal. The demand for Service Tax on the sale and supply of printed flags and glow-sign boards was found unjustified, as it did not constitute advertising agency services. However, the demand for Service Tax on miscellaneous income and GTA services was upheld. The Tribunal held that the demand raised by invoking the longer period was time-barred, as it relied on public documents without evidence of mala fide intentions, making the extended limitation period inapplicable. en-us Thu, 16 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Nov 2020 11:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380299 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal. The demand for Service Tax on the sale and supply of printed flags and glow-sign boards was found unjustified, as it did not constitute advertising agency services. However, the demand for Service Tax on miscellaneous income and GTA services was upheld. The Tribunal held that the demand raised by invoking the longer period was time-barred, as it relied on public documents without evidence of mala fide intentions, making the extended limitation period inapplicable. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 16 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380299