<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1014 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380286</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the Appellant-department and confirmed the order of the Commissioner (Appeals), while allowing the cross objection filed by the respondent. The judgment focused on issues such as the correct application of CENVAT credit rules, taxability on trading of goods, and the significance of audit reports in determining duty liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2019 05:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=571591" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1014 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380286</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the Appellant-department and confirmed the order of the Commissioner (Appeals), while allowing the cross objection filed by the respondent. The judgment focused on issues such as the correct application of CENVAT credit rules, taxability on trading of goods, and the significance of audit reports in determining duty liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380286</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>