<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1868 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280700</link>
    <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The ITAT held that a mere change in the head of income, without deliberate concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars, does not warrant a penalty. Emphasizing precedents, the ITAT directed the AO to cancel the penalty, allowing the appeal filed by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2019 20:38:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=571579" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1868 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280700</link>
      <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The ITAT held that a mere change in the head of income, without deliberate concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars, does not warrant a penalty. Emphasizing precedents, the ITAT directed the AO to cancel the penalty, allowing the appeal filed by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280700</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>