<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1668 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280710</link>
    <description>A High Court direction requiring the Commissioner, VAT to seek an explanation from the VATO and initiate disciplinary action was set aside as unsustainable. The refund direction was not disturbed and was required to be complied with by the end of April 2017. The special leave petition was disposed of on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2019 20:38:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=571578" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1668 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280710</link>
      <description>A High Court direction requiring the Commissioner, VAT to seek an explanation from the VATO and initiate disciplinary action was set aside as unsustainable. The refund direction was not disturbed and was required to be complied with by the end of April 2017. The special leave petition was disposed of on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280710</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>