<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 1197 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280698</link>
    <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeals by directing adjustments to the net profit rate, deleting unjustified additions and penalties. The decisions were based on the lack of concrete evidence for higher profit rates and improper application of section 41(1) for reclassified liabilities. The tribunal emphasized fairness and consistency with established legal principles, leading to the deletion of penalties related to estimated additions without evidence of concealment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2019 17:13:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=571566" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 1197 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280698</link>
      <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeals by directing adjustments to the net profit rate, deleting unjustified additions and penalties. The decisions were based on the lack of concrete evidence for higher profit rates and improper application of section 41(1) for reclassified liabilities. The tribunal emphasized fairness and consistency with established legal principles, leading to the deletion of penalties related to estimated additions without evidence of concealment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280698</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>