https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280695 The court dismissed the Original Petition challenging the order sanctioning additional rewards for providing information leading to the seizure of contraband goods. Emphasizing the discretionary power of administrative authorities in granting rewards, the court held that judicial interference is limited to cases of patent discrimination. The petitioner's challenge to the order sanctioning a further sum was rejected as it failed to establish grounds of arbitrariness, discrimination, or mala fides. The judgment underscored the responsible and reasonable exercise of discretionary power by administrative authorities, highlighting the limited scope of judicial review in such matters. en-us Thu, 06 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 May 2019 14:29:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280695 The court dismissed the Original Petition challenging the order sanctioning additional rewards for providing information leading to the seizure of contraband goods. Emphasizing the discretionary power of administrative authorities in granting rewards, the court held that judicial interference is limited to cases of patent discrimination. The petitioner's challenge to the order sanctioning a further sum was rejected as it failed to establish grounds of arbitrariness, discrimination, or mala fides. The judgment underscored the responsible and reasonable exercise of discretionary power by administrative authorities, highlighting the limited scope of judicial review in such matters. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 06 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280695