<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>CIT Validly Challenges AO&#039;s Allowance of Cash, Prior Period Expenses, and Incentives Deductions u/s 263.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46567</link>
    <description>Revision u/s 263 - cash expenditure , prior period expenses, provisions for incentive etc. - CIT has not exercised jurisdiction u/s 263 on the ground of ‘no enquiry’ or ‘lack of enquiry’ made by the AO but on conclusions drawn by the AO in allowing expenditure set out in the SCN u/s 263 ought not to have been allowed as deduction - jurisdiction validly invoked</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2019 09:00:34 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2019 09:00:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=571504" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>CIT Validly Challenges AO&#039;s Allowance of Cash, Prior Period Expenses, and Incentives Deductions u/s 263.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46567</link>
      <description>Revision u/s 263 - cash expenditure , prior period expenses, provisions for incentive etc. - CIT has not exercised jurisdiction u/s 263 on the ground of ‘no enquiry’ or ‘lack of enquiry’ made by the AO but on conclusions drawn by the AO in allowing expenditure set out in the SCN u/s 263 ought not to have been allowed as deduction - jurisdiction validly invoked</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2019 09:00:34 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46567</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>