<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 983 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380255</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the appellant was not involved in the fraud and had purchased the license in good faith. The Tribunal held that the appellant could not be held responsible for the payment of import duty, interest, and penalty. The extended period for issuing the Show Cause Notice was also deemed inapplicable, making the demand time-barred. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2019 08:58:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=571490" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 983 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380255</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the appellant was not involved in the fraud and had purchased the license in good faith. The Tribunal held that the appellant could not be held responsible for the payment of import duty, interest, and penalty. The extended period for issuing the Show Cause Notice was also deemed inapplicable, making the demand time-barred. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380255</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>