https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380248 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand for service tax on Mandap Keeper Service and Outdoor Catering Service. It found that the appellant did not provide Mandap Keeper Service and that the Outdoor Catering Service demand was not substantiated with corroborative evidence. The Tribunal also noted procedural lapses in handling electronic data, deeming the demand unsustainable. The appeal was granted with consequential benefits, emphasizing the importance of concrete evidence in allegations of service tax evasion. en-us Thu, 16 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Dec 2019 16:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380248 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand for service tax on Mandap Keeper Service and Outdoor Catering Service. It found that the appellant did not provide Mandap Keeper Service and that the Outdoor Catering Service demand was not substantiated with corroborative evidence. The Tribunal also noted procedural lapses in handling electronic data, deeming the demand unsustainable. The appeal was granted with consequential benefits, emphasizing the importance of concrete evidence in allegations of service tax evasion. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 16 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380248