<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 966 - TELANGANA AND ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380238</link>
    <description>The court upheld the conviction of the petitioner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoring a cheque issued as a hand loan. The petitioner&#039;s failure to prove payment under the cheque, establish non-existence of consideration, and rebut the legal presumptions led to the dismissal of the revision case. The court emphasized the importance of providing substantial evidence to challenge legal presumptions in such matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2019 14:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=571463" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 966 - TELANGANA AND ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380238</link>
      <description>The court upheld the conviction of the petitioner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoring a cheque issued as a hand loan. The petitioner&#039;s failure to prove payment under the cheque, establish non-existence of consideration, and rebut the legal presumptions led to the dismissal of the revision case. The court emphasized the importance of providing substantial evidence to challenge legal presumptions in such matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380238</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>