<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1886 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280688</link>
    <description>The Gujarat HC admitted a tax appeal raising the question whether CESTAT was correct in directing release of seized gold on payment of a redemption fine. The document records only the substantial question of law framed for consideration and indicates that the dispute concerns the legality of permitting release of confiscated goods against redemption fine in customs proceedings. No final adjudication or outcome is stated in the text.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2019 07:40:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=571452" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1886 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280688</link>
      <description>The Gujarat HC admitted a tax appeal raising the question whether CESTAT was correct in directing release of seized gold on payment of a redemption fine. The document records only the substantial question of law framed for consideration and indicates that the dispute concerns the legality of permitting release of confiscated goods against redemption fine in customs proceedings. No final adjudication or outcome is stated in the text.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280688</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>