<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (8) TMI 558 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280670</link>
    <description>Publication or exhibition of video films without the statutory particulars required for video films may attract liability under the special offence provision governing contraventions of those labelling requirements. The analysis treats proof of the individual copyright owner&#039;s identity as unnecessary where liability rests on publication or exhibition without the mandated particulars, reflecting the anti-piracy purpose of the Copyright Act, 1957. It distinguishes the general copyright-infringement offence from the specific offence applicable to video films and sound recordings published in breach of prescribed particulars, supporting alteration of a conviction to the specific provision where that factual contravention is established.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2019 11:31:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=571391" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (8) TMI 558 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280670</link>
      <description>Publication or exhibition of video films without the statutory particulars required for video films may attract liability under the special offence provision governing contraventions of those labelling requirements. The analysis treats proof of the individual copyright owner&#039;s identity as unnecessary where liability rests on publication or exhibition without the mandated particulars, reflecting the anti-piracy purpose of the Copyright Act, 1957. It distinguishes the general copyright-infringement offence from the specific offence applicable to video films and sound recordings published in breach of prescribed particulars, supporting alteration of a conviction to the specific provision where that factual contravention is established.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280670</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>