<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (6) TMI 57 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18139</link>
    <description>Chapter XX-C pre-emptive purchase requires valuation on the statutory market-value basis and observance of fair procedure before compulsory acquisition is invoked. The text states that an arbitrary 10% deduction in building value, reliance on undisclosed material, a two-day response period, and use of new grounds in the final order without fresh notice rendered the process unsustainable for breach of the valuation framework and natural justice. It also notes that, where the pre-emptive purchase order is quashed, a writ court may grant consequential relief directly and need not remand the matter if the circumstances justify issuance of the no objection certificate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:44:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57139" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (6) TMI 57 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18139</link>
      <description>Chapter XX-C pre-emptive purchase requires valuation on the statutory market-value basis and observance of fair procedure before compulsory acquisition is invoked. The text states that an arbitrary 10% deduction in building value, reliance on undisclosed material, a two-day response period, and use of new grounds in the final order without fresh notice rendered the process unsustainable for breach of the valuation framework and natural justice. It also notes that, where the pre-emptive purchase order is quashed, a writ court may grant consequential relief directly and need not remand the matter if the circumstances justify issuance of the no objection certificate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18139</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>