<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 963 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, KARNATAKA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380235</link>
    <description>An applicant engaged in construction of complex or building sought an advance ruling on whether construction intended for sale to a buyer, where consideration is received or receivable only after completion, is a taxable service under GST. No appearance was made at the hearing, and the applicant later requested withdrawal of the application. The AAR therefore disposed of the advance ruling application as withdrawn, without deciding the taxability question.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2025 18:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=571381" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 963 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, KARNATAKA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380235</link>
      <description>An applicant engaged in construction of complex or building sought an advance ruling on whether construction intended for sale to a buyer, where consideration is received or receivable only after completion, is a taxable service under GST. No appearance was made at the hearing, and the applicant later requested withdrawal of the application. The AAR therefore disposed of the advance ruling application as withdrawn, without deciding the taxability question.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380235</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>