<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 962 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, KARNATAKA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380234</link>
    <description>An advance ruling application concerning whether the proposed slump sale of a hotel as a going concern would amount to a supply of goods or services, and whether it would fall within the exemption for transfer of a going concern, was withdrawn by the applicant before the AAR could examine the questions on merits. The application was therefore disposed of as withdrawn, and no substantive ruling was issued on the tax treatment of the proposed transaction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2025 18:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=571380" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 962 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, KARNATAKA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380234</link>
      <description>An advance ruling application concerning whether the proposed slump sale of a hotel as a going concern would amount to a supply of goods or services, and whether it would fall within the exemption for transfer of a going concern, was withdrawn by the applicant before the AAR could examine the questions on merits. The application was therefore disposed of as withdrawn, and no substantive ruling was issued on the tax treatment of the proposed transaction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380234</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>