<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (12) TMI 8 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18138</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, holding that the clerical error in the cheque did not invalidate the purchase order. The court found that the full consideration amount was tendered, resolving discrepancies in payment. Additionally, the court deemed the valuation method used in the purchase order as reasonable, based on relevant factors. The respondents were directed not to auction the property for two months and to revalidate the cheque for Rs. 60 lakhs within 15 days.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2018 15:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57138" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (12) TMI 8 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18138</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, holding that the clerical error in the cheque did not invalidate the purchase order. The court found that the full consideration amount was tendered, resolving discrepancies in payment. Additionally, the court deemed the valuation method used in the purchase order as reasonable, based on relevant factors. The respondents were directed not to auction the property for two months and to revalidate the cheque for Rs. 60 lakhs within 15 days.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18138</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>