https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380231 The High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, a registered dealer under the GST Act, in a case challenging detention notices and penalties imposed under Sections 129(1)(a) and 129(1)(b) of the CGST Act. The court ordered the release of the detained goods upon furnishing a bank guarantee, allowing the petitioner to appeal the penalty order within one month. The appeal process was mandated to be resolved within three months, with the bank guarantee not to be invoked during the appeal proceedings. en-us Tue, 12 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 08 Mar 2025 11:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380231 The High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, a registered dealer under the GST Act, in a case challenging detention notices and penalties imposed under Sections 129(1)(a) and 129(1)(b) of the CGST Act. The court ordered the release of the detained goods upon furnishing a bank guarantee, allowing the petitioner to appeal the penalty order within one month. The appeal process was mandated to be resolved within three months, with the bank guarantee not to be invoked during the appeal proceedings. Case-Laws GST Tue, 12 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380231