<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 952 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380224</link>
    <description>The Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the addition made under Section 56(2)(viib) in favor of the Assessee company was upheld by the Court. The Court emphasized the need for the Assessing Authority to determine the Fair Market Value before applying Section 56(2)(viib) and remanded the case for further examination without expressing any opinion on the case&#039;s merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2021 13:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=571364" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 952 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380224</link>
      <description>The Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the addition made under Section 56(2)(viib) in favor of the Assessee company was upheld by the Court. The Court emphasized the need for the Assessing Authority to determine the Fair Market Value before applying Section 56(2)(viib) and remanded the case for further examination without expressing any opinion on the case&#039;s merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380224</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>