<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 944 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380216</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling the penalty under section 271B of the Income Tax Act was not sustainable due to being time-barred. The penalty initiation, after a significant delay of more than four years from the original assessment order, was deemed unjustified and against statutory provisions. The decision emphasized the necessity of timely initiation and completion of penalty proceedings in compliance with legal requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 12:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=571352" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 944 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380216</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling the penalty under section 271B of the Income Tax Act was not sustainable due to being time-barred. The penalty initiation, after a significant delay of more than four years from the original assessment order, was deemed unjustified and against statutory provisions. The decision emphasized the necessity of timely initiation and completion of penalty proceedings in compliance with legal requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380216</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>