<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal Revisits Ex-Parte Order u/s 254, Accepts New Evidence for Depreciation Claim, Imposes Rs. 5000 Cost.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46535</link>
    <description>Rectification of mistake u/s 254 - ex-parte order on merit - assessee produced certain records after ex-parte order - factual aspect whether the assessee has received any income from hire charges is very crucial for deciding the issue of claim of higher depreciation on these machinery and vehicle - Tribunal is recalled its order with cost of &amp;#8377; 5000/</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2019 08:03:23 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2019 08:03:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=571351" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal Revisits Ex-Parte Order u/s 254, Accepts New Evidence for Depreciation Claim, Imposes Rs. 5000 Cost.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46535</link>
      <description>Rectification of mistake u/s 254 - ex-parte order on merit - assessee produced certain records after ex-parte order - factual aspect whether the assessee has received any income from hire charges is very crucial for deciding the issue of claim of higher depreciation on these machinery and vehicle - Tribunal is recalled its order with cost of &amp;#8377; 5000/</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2019 08:03:23 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46535</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>