https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380203 The court set aside the detention order under the COFEPOSA Act against the petitioner due to lack of evidence establishing his involvement in smuggling activities. The petitioner's argument that the order had lost its utility after a long delay in execution was supported, emphasizing his non-involvement in unlawful activities. Allegations of absconding and changing addresses were countered by the petitioner's counsel. The freezing of bank accounts under relevant acts was addressed, with ongoing legal proceedings indicated. The court stressed the importance of a causal connection and live-link between activities and detention, ultimately ruling in favor of the petitioner and quashing the detention order. en-us Fri, 10 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 May 2019 07:54:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380203 The court set aside the detention order under the COFEPOSA Act against the petitioner due to lack of evidence establishing his involvement in smuggling activities. The petitioner's argument that the order had lost its utility after a long delay in execution was supported, emphasizing his non-involvement in unlawful activities. Allegations of absconding and changing addresses were countered by the petitioner's counsel. The freezing of bank accounts under relevant acts was addressed, with ongoing legal proceedings indicated. The court stressed the importance of a causal connection and live-link between activities and detention, ultimately ruling in favor of the petitioner and quashing the detention order. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 10 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380203