<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Company Faces Winding Up Over Non-Payment; Dispute Centers on Retention of Defective Goods Without Payment or Return.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46559</link>
    <description>Winding up of the Company - Non payment of dues - One thing strikes out immediately. If the goods supplied by the petitioner remained defective, the respondent ought to have returned the goods back to the petitioner. It cannot continue to retain the goods without making the full the payment thereof.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2019 07:34:12 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2019 07:34:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=571318" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Company Faces Winding Up Over Non-Payment; Dispute Centers on Retention of Defective Goods Without Payment or Return.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46559</link>
      <description>Winding up of the Company - Non payment of dues - One thing strikes out immediately. If the goods supplied by the petitioner remained defective, the respondent ought to have returned the goods back to the petitioner. It cannot continue to retain the goods without making the full the payment thereof.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2019 07:34:12 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46559</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>