https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380183 The Tribunal dismissed the applicant's miscellaneous applications seeking an extension of stay as the main appeal was listed for hearing, deeming them infructuous. The appeal against the Central Excise duty demand for embroidery on fabrics was upheld by the Commissioner (Appeals), but the Tribunal set it aside due to lack of evidence in the show cause notice for undervaluation of cloth. The Tribunal also ruled that the extended period of limitation could not be invoked for the confirmed demand, ultimately allowing the appeal based on the limitation issue regarding the show cause notice. en-us Thu, 01 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 May 2019 06:41:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380183 The Tribunal dismissed the applicant's miscellaneous applications seeking an extension of stay as the main appeal was listed for hearing, deeming them infructuous. The appeal against the Central Excise duty demand for embroidery on fabrics was upheld by the Commissioner (Appeals), but the Tribunal set it aside due to lack of evidence in the show cause notice for undervaluation of cloth. The Tribunal also ruled that the extended period of limitation could not be invoked for the confirmed demand, ultimately allowing the appeal based on the limitation issue regarding the show cause notice. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 01 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380183