<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 910 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380182</link>
    <description>The court found the penalty imposed under Section 15-A(1)(a) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act to be illegal and arbitrary as authorities failed to consider reasonable cause for delayed payment and did not provide reasons for their decision. The Commercial Tax Tribunal&#039;s order upholding the penalty was set aside, and the revision was allowed. The court directed the refund of any excess amount deposited by the applicant within two months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2020 15:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=571300" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 910 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380182</link>
      <description>The court found the penalty imposed under Section 15-A(1)(a) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act to be illegal and arbitrary as authorities failed to consider reasonable cause for delayed payment and did not provide reasons for their decision. The Commercial Tax Tribunal&#039;s order upholding the penalty was set aside, and the revision was allowed. The court directed the refund of any excess amount deposited by the applicant within two months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380182</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>