<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 906 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380178</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, setting aside the demand for unearned increase based on the change in shareholding. The court directed the DDA to refund the amount of Rs. 3,94,57,027/- to the petitioner and execute the conveyance deed within six weeks, without waiting for the determination of the refundable amount. The petition was disposed of with these instructions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2019 17:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=571295" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 906 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380178</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, setting aside the demand for unearned increase based on the change in shareholding. The court directed the DDA to refund the amount of Rs. 3,94,57,027/- to the petitioner and execute the conveyance deed within six weeks, without waiting for the determination of the refundable amount. The petition was disposed of with these instructions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380178</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>