<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1536 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280667</link>
    <description>The court addressed issues related to the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the ITAT order for AY 2009-10, focusing on the treatment of expenditures and agreement similarities. The court declined to frame questions answered against the Revenue in previous orders and directed the parties to provide relevant information for further consideration, particularly regarding the similarity of agreements in different cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2019 06:26:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=571286" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1536 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280667</link>
      <description>The court addressed issues related to the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the ITAT order for AY 2009-10, focusing on the treatment of expenditures and agreement similarities. The court declined to frame questions answered against the Revenue in previous orders and directed the parties to provide relevant information for further consideration, particularly regarding the similarity of agreements in different cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280667</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>