<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (2) TMI 376 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280655</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the Government was entitled to collect royalty for minerals extracted from its quarry. The grant of the right to extract minerals constituted a lease, making the contractors liable to pay royalty as per the contract terms. The Court emphasized that the liability to pay royalty arose from the contract itself, dismissing the writ petitions and allowing the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 15:34:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=571252" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (2) TMI 376 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280655</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the Government was entitled to collect royalty for minerals extracted from its quarry. The grant of the right to extract minerals constituted a lease, making the contractors liable to pay royalty as per the contract terms. The Court emphasized that the liability to pay royalty arose from the contract itself, dismissing the writ petitions and allowing the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280655</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>