<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 829 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280652</link>
    <description>The appeal by the revenue and the cross objection by the assessee were dismissed as the court held that for Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act to apply, the assessee must be both a registered and beneficial shareholder of the lender company. Since the assessee did not meet these conditions, the deeming provisions under Section 2(22)(e) could not be invoked.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 12:14:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=571239" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 829 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280652</link>
      <description>The appeal by the revenue and the cross objection by the assessee were dismissed as the court held that for Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act to apply, the assessee must be both a registered and beneficial shareholder of the lender company. Since the assessee did not meet these conditions, the deeming provisions under Section 2(22)(e) could not be invoked.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280652</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>