<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 897 - TELANGANA AND ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380169</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging recovery orders due to lack of personal hearing, citing availability of alternative remedy under Section 107 of the Act and petitioner&#039;s attempt to avoid statutory deposit for appeal. The Court emphasized the need to exhaust alternative remedies before resorting to writ jurisdiction, concluding that the petitioner&#039;s rush to Court was unwarranted. Consequently, the Court declined to entertain the petition, dismissing it without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 08:34:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=571207" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 897 - TELANGANA AND ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380169</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging recovery orders due to lack of personal hearing, citing availability of alternative remedy under Section 107 of the Act and petitioner&#039;s attempt to avoid statutory deposit for appeal. The Court emphasized the need to exhaust alternative remedies before resorting to writ jurisdiction, concluding that the petitioner&#039;s rush to Court was unwarranted. Consequently, the Court declined to entertain the petition, dismissing it without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380169</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>