<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 891 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380163</link>
    <description>The court upheld the order of the Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, determining compounding charges at 5% for the offence under Section 276-B for the Financial Years 2013-14 and 2014-15. The court found that the applications were not valid until correctly filed, considering them as second occasions per CBDT guidelines. The petitioner&#039;s plea to treat the applications as first occasions was rejected, affirming the 5% compounding fee calculation. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2020 15:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=571196" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 891 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380163</link>
      <description>The court upheld the order of the Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, determining compounding charges at 5% for the offence under Section 276-B for the Financial Years 2013-14 and 2014-15. The court found that the applications were not valid until correctly filed, considering them as second occasions per CBDT guidelines. The petitioner&#039;s plea to treat the applications as first occasions was rejected, affirming the 5% compounding fee calculation. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380163</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>