<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 884 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380156</link>
    <description>For deduction under section 80IC, each eligible undertaking had to be computed on a standalone basis as if it were the only source of income. The Tribunal held that section 80IC, read with section 80IC(7) and section 80IA(5), did not permit clubbing profits and losses of different eligible units, and distinguished the Revenue&#039;s reliance on section 80IA authorities because the statutory language differed materially. Losses of one eligible unit could not be set off against profits of another eligible unit for calculating the deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 May 2019 14:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=571186" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 884 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380156</link>
      <description>For deduction under section 80IC, each eligible undertaking had to be computed on a standalone basis as if it were the only source of income. The Tribunal held that section 80IC, read with section 80IC(7) and section 80IA(5), did not permit clubbing profits and losses of different eligible units, and distinguished the Revenue&#039;s reliance on section 80IA authorities because the statutory language differed materially. Losses of one eligible unit could not be set off against profits of another eligible unit for calculating the deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380156</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>