https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380150 The appeal under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was dismissed by the Adjudicating Authority due to inconsistencies in payments and non-compliance with Section 9(3)(c) by the Operational Creditor. The lack of specific evidence regarding forwarded invoices and doubts about the debt and default led to the dismissal. The Tribunal upheld this decision, denying relief but allowing the Appellant to pursue appropriate relief in the Court of Competent Jurisdiction. The case emphasized the necessity of strict proof of debt and default for such applications. en-us Wed, 08 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 May 2019 08:33:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380150 The appeal under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was dismissed by the Adjudicating Authority due to inconsistencies in payments and non-compliance with Section 9(3)(c) by the Operational Creditor. The lack of specific evidence regarding forwarded invoices and doubts about the debt and default led to the dismissal. The Tribunal upheld this decision, denying relief but allowing the Appellant to pursue appropriate relief in the Court of Competent Jurisdiction. The case emphasized the necessity of strict proof of debt and default for such applications. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Wed, 08 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380150